![]() ![]() Well, it seems I just went ahead and converted the list to a table, realizing weeks later there could be something about just that on the Talk page. By the way, there is something wrong with QQ'a numbers - Artem a 04:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC) And whith it we can easy compare sizes of IM-networks without messing up with active/total/peak numbers. rjcuk 21:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC) I agree table will better. Otherwise I think I should be able to live with it - and - it might be easier to edit in list format.ģ.3 million unique visitors per month ( August 2006)Ĥ0-50 million users large error margin because of unpublished user counts for Google Talk ( October 2006)ģ5 million users (including 4 million mobile) ( October 2006)Ģ million users (majority in South Africa, more than 150,000 international) ( October 2006) Or maybe it would be better organising this by date (I haven't a clue how to do that, though). I checked "Wikipedia:When_to_use_tables", and it does say "Try not to use tables for putting a caption under a photograph, arranging a group of links, or other strictly visual features." I'm not sure if this is one of those times. I was just wondering - might it be better for this information to be displayed in a table? I found it really difficult trying to read the list of instant messengers - does anyone else feel the same? Maybe it's just me. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |